PRESTO: A Phase III, Open-Label Study of Intensification of Androgen Blockade in Patients With High-Risk Biochemically Relapsed Castration-Sensitive Prostate Cancer (AFT-19).

PURPOSE: Patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BRPC) after radical prostatectomy and a short PSA doubling time are at risk for distant metastases. Apalutamide, an androgen receptor antagonist, and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) prolong survival in the metastatic setting. We evaluated whether intensification of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) improves outcomes in BRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PRESTO is a randomized phase III, open-label trial in patients with BRPC and PSA doubling time ≤9 months (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03009981). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive a finite 52-week treatment course with ADT control, ADT + apalutamide, or ADT + apalutamide + AAP. The primary end point was PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), defined as serum PSA >0.2 ng/mL after treatment completion. RESULTS: Five hundred three patients were enrolled. The median PSA was 1.8 ng/mL (IQR, 1.0-3.6). At the first planned interim analysis, both experimental arms significantly prolonged PSA-PFS compared with the control arm (median, 24.9 months for ADT + apalutamide v 20.3 months for ADT; hazard ratio [HR], 0.52 [95% CI, 0.35 to 0.77]; P = .00047; median, 26.0 months for ADT + apalutamide + AAP v 20.0 months for ADT; HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.71]; P = .00008). Median time to testosterone recovery did not differ across treatment arms. The most common grade ≥3 adverse event was hypertension (7.5%, 7.4%, and 18% in ADT, ADT + apalutamide, and ADT + apalutamide + AAP arms, respectively). CONCLUSION: Intensified AR blockade for a finite duration prolongs PSA-PFS with a manageable safety profile, without adversely affecting time to testosterone recovery. The addition of apalutamide to ADT should be considered in patients with high-risk BRPC.

Lorlatinib Tolerability and Association With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Advanced ALK- or ROS1-Rearranged NSCLC: A Brief Report.

Introduction: Treatment with lorlatinib for patients with advanced ALK- and ROS1-rearranged NSCLC (ALK+ and ROS1+ NSCLC) is associated with a unique set of adverse events (AEs) often requiring dose reduction. However, the impact of dose reductions on outcomes remains unclear and is mainly limited to analyses from prospective studies of lorlatinib in the first-line setting. Methods: We reviewed the course of 144 patients with advanced ALK- or ROS1-rearranged NSCLC treated with lorlatinib in the second-line or later setting to assess the frequency of dose reductions resulting from treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) and the association between dose reductions and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 58 patients (40%) had TRAE-related dose reductions, most (59%) owing to neurocognitive AEs or neuropathy. Among all patients, the median PFS was 8.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.4-11.8); the median OS was 20.7 months (95% CI: 16.3-30.5). Among patients who were started on lorlatinib 100 mg/d (n = 122), a Cox regression model with the occurrence of a dose reduction as a time-dependent covariate indicated no association between dose reduction and PFS (hazard ratio = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.54-1.39) or OS (hazard ratio = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.47-1.30). Conclusions: Lorlatinib dose reductions were not associated with inferior clinical outcomes in this multicenter analysis. Prompt identification of lorlatinib TRAEs and implementation of dose reductions may help maximize tolerability without compromising outcomes.

A Modified Net Reclassification Improvement Statistic.

The continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI) statistic is a popular model change measure that was developed to assess the incremental value of new factors in a risk prediction model. Two prominent statistical issues identified in the literature call the utility of this measure into question: (1) it is not a proper scoring function and (2) it has a high false positive rate when testing whether new factors contribute to the risk model. For binary response regression models, these subjects are interrogated and a modification of the continuous NRI, guided by the likelihood-based score residual, is proposed to address these issues. Within a nested model framework, the modified NRI may be viewed as a distance measure between two risk models. An application of the modified NRI is illustrated using prostate cancer data.

Randomized Phase III Study of Enzalutamide Compared With Enzalutamide Plus Abiraterone for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (Alliance A031201 Trial).

PURPOSE: Enzalutamide and abiraterone both target androgen receptor signaling but via different mechanisms. The mechanism of action of one drug may counteract the resistance pathways of the other. We sought to determine whether the addition of abiraterone acetate and prednisone (AAP) to enzalutamide prolongs overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the first-line setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men with untreated mCRPC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive first-line enzalutamide with or without AAP. The primary end point was OS. Toxicity, prostate-specific antigen declines, pharmacokinetics, and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) were also examined. Data were analyzed using an intent-to-treat approach. The Kaplan-Meier estimate and the stratified log-rank statistic were used to compare OS between treatments. RESULTS: In total, 1,311 patients were randomly assigned: 657 to enzalutamide and 654 to enzalutamide plus AAP. OS was not statistically different between the two arms (median, 32.7 [95% CI, 30.5 to 35.4] months for enzalutamide v 34.2 [95% CI, 31.4 to 37.3] months for enzalutamide and AAP; hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; one-sided P = .03; boundary nominal significance level = .02). rPFS was longer in the combination arm (median rPFS, 21.3 [95% CI, 19.4 to 22.9] months for enzalutamide v 24.3 [95% CI, 22.3 to 26.7] months for enzalutamide and AAP; HR, 0.86; two-sided P = .02). However, pharmacokinetic clearance of abiraterone was 2.2- to 2.9-fold higher when administered with enzalutamide, compared with clearance values for abiraterone alone. CONCLUSION: The addition of AAP to enzalutamide for first-line treatment of mCRPC was not associated with a statistically significant benefit in OS. Drug-drug interactions between the two agents resulting in increased abiraterone clearance may partly account for this result, although these interactions did not prevent the combination regimen from having more nonhematologic toxicity.

The ectonucleotidase CD39 identifies tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells predictive of immune checkpoint blockade efficacy in human lung cancer.

Improved identification of anti-tumor T cells is needed to advance cancer immunotherapies. CD39 expression is a promising surrogate of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells. Here, we comprehensively profiled CD39 expression in human lung cancer. CD39 expression enriched for CD8+ T cells with features of exhaustion, tumor reactivity, and clonal expansion. Flow cytometry of 440 lung cancer biospecimens revealed weak association between CD39+ CD8+ T cells and tumoral features, such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), tumor mutation burden, and driver mutations. Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), but not cytotoxic chemotherapy, increased intratumoral CD39+ CD8+ T cells. Higher baseline frequency of CD39+ CD8+ T cells conferred improved clinical outcomes from ICB therapy. Furthermore, a gene signature of CD39+ CD8+ T cells predicted benefit from ICB, but not chemotherapy, in a phase III clinical trial of non-small cell lung cancer. These findings highlight CD39 as a proxy of tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells in human lung cancer.

Molecular Biomarkers of Disease Outcomes and Mechanisms of Acquired Resistance to First-Line Osimertinib in Advanced EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancers.

INTRODUCTION: Preferred first-line treatment for patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung cancer is osimertinib, yet it is not known whether patient outcomes may be improved by identifying and intervening on molecular markers associated with therapeutic resistance. METHODS: All patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung cancer treated with first-line osimertinib at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (n = 327) were identified. Available pretreatment and postprogression tumor samples underwent targeted gene panel sequencing and mutational signature analysis using SigMA algorithm. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Using multivariate analysis, baseline atypical EGFR (median PFS = 5.8 mo, p < 0.001) and concurrent TP53/RB1 alterations (median PFS = 10.5 mo, p = 0.015) were associated with shorter PFS on first-line osimertinib. Of 95 patients with postprogression biopsies, acquired resistance mechanisms were identified in 52% (off-target, n = 24; histologic transformation, n = 14; on-target, n = 12), with MET amplification (n = 9), small cell lung transformation (n = 7), and acquired EGFR amplification (n = 7), the most frequently identified mechanisms. Although there was no difference in postprogression survival on the basis of identified resistance (p = 0.07), patients with subsequent second-line therapy tailored to postprogression biopsy results had improved postprogression survival (hazard ratio = 0.09, p = 0.006). The paired postprogression tumors had higher tumor mutational burden (p = 0.008) and further dominant APOBEC mutational signatures (p = 0.07) compared with the pretreatment samples. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer treated with first-line osimertinib have improved survival with treatment adaptation on the basis of identified mechanisms of resistance at time of progression using tissue-based genomic analysis. Further survival gains may be achieved using risk-based treatment adaptation of pretreatment genomic alterations.

Inhibition of NF-κB DNA Binding Suppresses Myeloma Growth via Intracellular Redox and Tumor Microenvironment Modulation.

Multiple myeloma is a plasma cell malignancy that is still largely incurable, despite considerable progress in recent years. NF-κB is a well-established therapeutic target in multiple myeloma, but none of the currently available treatment options offer direct, specific pharmacologic targeting of NF-κB transcriptional activity. Thus, we designed a novel direct NF-κB inhibitor (IT848) as a drug candidate with strong potential for clinical translation and conducted comprehensive in vitro and in vivo mechanistic studies in multiple myeloma cell lines, primary multiple myeloma cells, xenograft models, and immunocompetent mouse models of multiple myeloma. Here, we show that IT848 inhibits NF-κB activity through inhibition of DNA binding of all five NF-κB subunits. IT848 treatment of multiple myeloma cell lines and patient samples inhibited proliferation and induced caspase-dependent and independent apoptosis. In addition to direct NF-κB inhibitory effects, IT848 treatment altered the redox homeostasis of multiple myeloma cells through depletion of the reduced glutathione pool, selectively inducing oxidative stress in multiple myeloma but not in healthy cells. Multiple myeloma xenograft studies confirmed the efficacy of IT848 as single agent and in combination with bortezomib. Furthermore, IT848 significantly improved survival when combined with programmed death protein 1 inhibition, and correlative immune studies revealed that this clinical benefit was associated with suppression of regulatory T-cell infiltration of the bone marrow microenvironment. In conclusion, IT848 is a potent direct NF-κB inhibitor and inducer of oxidative stress specifically in tumor cells, displaying significant activity against multiple myeloma cells in vitro and in vivo, both as monotherapy as well as in combination with bortezomib or immune checkpoint blockade.

Dominant epitopes presented by prevalent HLA alleles permit wide use of banked CMVpp65 T cells in adoptive therapy.

We established and characterized a bank of 138 CMVpp65 peptide-specific T-cell (CMVpp65CTLs) lines from healthy marrow transplant donors who consented to their use for treatment of individuals other than their transplant recipient. CMVpp65CTL lines included 131 containing predominantly CD8+ T cells and 7 CD4+ T cells. CD8+ CMVpp65CTLs were specific for 1 to 3 epitopes each presented by one of only 34 of the 148 class I alleles in the bank. Similarly, the 7 predominantly CD4+ CMVpp65CTL lines were each specific for epitopes presented by 14 of 40 HLA DR alleles in the bank. Although the number of HLA alleles presenting CMV epitopes is low, their prevalence is high, permitting selection of CMVpp65CTLs restricted by an HLA allele shared by transplant recipient and hematopoietic cell transplant donor for >90% of an ethnogeographically diverse population of hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Within individuals, responses to CMVpp65 peptides presented by different HLA alleles are hierarchical. Furthermore, within groups, epitopes presented by HLA B*07:02 and HLA A*02:01 consistently elicit immunodominant CMVpp65CTLs, irrespective of other HLA alleles inherited. All dominant CMVpp65CTLs exhibited HLA-restricted cytotoxicity against epitope loaded targets and usually cleared CMV infections. However, immunodominant CMVpp65CTLs responding to epitopes presented by certain HLA B*35 alleles were ineffective in lysing CMV-infected cells in vitro or controlling CMV infections post adoptive therapy. Analysis of the hierarchy of T-cell responses to CMVpp65, the HLA alleles presenting immunodominant CMVpp65 epitopes, and the responses they induce may lead to detailed algorithms for optimal choice of third-party CMVpp65CTLs for effective adoptive therapy.

Automated Bone Scan Index to Optimize Prostate Cancer Working Group Radiographic Progression Criteria for Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) by Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG) criteria is a radiographic endpoint. The automated bone scan index (aBSI) quantifies osseous disease burden on bone scintigraphy as a percentage of total skeletal weight. Using the aBSI, we sought to quantify increase in tumor burden represented by PCWG progression criteria, and to determine the interval increase that best associates with overall survival (OS). PATIENT AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of trials using androgen receptor axis-targeted drugs for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients (mCRPC). aBSI increase in bone disease was assessed from baseline scan to time-to-progression (per PCWG criteria). Threshold for time to aBSI increase were explored and the association between each time-to-threshold and OS was computed. RESULTS: A total of 169 mCPRC patients had bone scans available for aBSI analysis. Of these, 90 (53%) had progression in bone meeting PCWG criteria. Total aBSI increase in patients meeting PCWG criteria was 1.22 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.65-2.49), with a median relative increase of 109% (IQR: 40%-377%). Median aBSI at baseline was 3.1 (IQR: 1.3-7.1). The best association between OS and time-to-progression occurred with an absolute increase in aBSI equal to 0.6 (Kendall's tau 0.52). CONCLUSION: An absolute increase of 0.6 or more in aBSI from the first follow-up scan results in the highest association with OS in patients with mCRPC. The rPFS by PCWG, identified progression at nearly twice this tumor burden, suggesting that aBSI may be used to further develop the PCWG criteria without degrading its association with OS.

Immune biomarkers and response to checkpoint inhibition of BRAFV600 and BRAF non-V600 altered lung cancers.

BACKGROUND: While 2-4% of lung cancers possess alterations in BRAF, little is known about the immune responsiveness of these tumours. METHODS: Clinical and genomic data were collected from 5945 patients with lung cancers whose tumours underwent next-generation sequencing between 2015 and 2018. Patients were followed through 2020. RESULTS: In total, 127 patients with metastatic BRAF-altered lung cancers were identified: 29 tumours had Class I mutations, 59 had Class II/III alterations, and 39 had variants of unknown significance (VUS). Tumour mutation burden was higher in Class II/III than Class I-altered tumours (8.8 mutations/Mb versus 4.9, P < 0.001), but this difference was diminished when stratified by smoking status. The overall response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) was 9% in Class I-altered tumours and 26% in Class II/III (P = 0.25), with median time on treatment of 1.9 months in both groups. Among patients with Class I-III-altered tumours, 36-month HR for death in those who ever versus never received ICI was 1.82 (1.17-6.11). Nine patients were on ICI for >2 years (two with Class I mutations, two with Class II/III alterations, and five with VUS). CONCLUSIONS: A subset of patients with BRAF-altered lung cancers achieved durable disease control on ICI. However, collectively no significant clinical benefit was seen.

Randomized Phase 2 Trial of Abiraterone Acetate Plus Prednisone, Degarelix, or the Combination in Men with Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Phase 2 trial endpoints that can be utilized in high-risk biochemical recurrence (BCR) after prostatectomy as a way of more rapidly identifying treatments for phase 3 trials are urgently needed. The efficacy of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in BCR is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rates of complete biochemical responses after testosterone recovery after 8 mo of AAP and degarelix, a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, alone or in combination. DESIGN SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with BCR (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥1.0 ng/ml, PSA doubling time ≤9 mo, no metastases on standard imaging, and testosterone ≥150 ng/dl) after prostatectomy (with or without prior radiotherapy) were included in this study. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to AAP (arm 1), AAP with degarelix (arm 2), or degarelix (arm 3) for 8 mo, and monitored for 18 mo. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was undetectable PSA with testosterone >150 ng/dl at 18 mo. Secondary endpoints were undetectable PSA at 8 mo and time to testosterone recovery. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: For the 122 patients enrolled, no difference was found between treatments for the primary endpoint (arm 1: 5.1% [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1-17%], arm 2: 17.1% [95% CI: 7-32%], arm 3: 11.9% [95% CI: 4-26%]; arm 1 vs 2, p = 0.93; arm 2 vs 3, p = 0.36). AAP therapy showed the shortest median time to testosterone recovery (36.0 wk [95% CI: 35.9-36.1]) relative to degarelix (52.9 wk [95% CI: 49.0-56.0], p < 0.001). Rates of undetectable PSA at 8 mo differed between AAP with degarelix and degarelix alone (p = 0.04), but not between AAP alone and degarelix alone (p = 0.12). Limitations of this study include a lack of long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of undetectable PSA levels with testosterone recovery were similar between arms, suggesting that increased androgen suppression with AAP and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is unlikely to eradicate recurrent disease compared with ADT alone. PATIENT SUMMARY: We evaluated the use of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), AAP alone, or ADT alone in men with biochemically recurrent, nonmetastatic prostate cancer. While more men who received the combination had an undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level at 8 mo on treatment, once men came off treatment and testosterone level rose, there was no difference in the rates of undetectable PSA levels. This suggests that the combination is not able to eradicate disease any better than ADT alone.

Pilot Study of Dacomitinib for Patients With Metastatic EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancers With Disease Progression After Initial Treatment With Osimertinib.

Patients with EGFR-mutant lung cancer have no approved targeted therapies after disease progression on first-line osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Preclinical studies suggest that tumors with both EGFR-sensitizing alteration and acquired second-site EGFR resistance alterations after treatment with osimertinib retain sensitivity to second-generation EGFR TKIs. We hypothesized that dacomitinib, a pan-human epidermal growth factor receptor TKI, may be effective in this setting. METHODS: In this phase II study, patients who had progressed on first-line osimertinib were treated with dacomitinib 45 mg orally daily until disease progression or intolerability. The primary end point was objective response rate. RESULTS: We enrolled 12 patients. Two partial responses were documented (17% objective response rate; 95% CI, 5 to 45). The median progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% CI, 1.6 to not reached). One patient with an original sensitizing EGFR G719A mutation and one patient without molecular testing available had partial responses, whereas 0 of the 3 patients with second-site acquired EGFR resistance mutations (two C797S and one G724S) met the response criteria. The patient with EGFR G719A has an ongoing response at 17 months, which exceeds prior time on osimertinib (11 months). CONCLUSION: In the first trial evaluating a second-generation EGFR TKI after first-line third-generation osimertinib, we found that dacomitinib after disease progression on osimertinib has limited benefit.

A Phase II, Nonrandomized Open Trial Assessing Pain Efficacy with Radium-223 in Symptomatic Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 and FDA guidelines recommend a standardized approach to pain assessment in preapproval trials. No prior trial has examined pain palliation of Radium-223 using standard dosing and contemporary PRO pain-assessment tools. METHODS: In this multicenter phase II trial, patients with Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) ≥3 were eligible for Radium-223 per its label. Primary endpoint was a 30% decrease in BPI Worst Pain from baseline to Week 8, sustained at Week 12 without escalation of medication on the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder. Secondary endpoints included changes in Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Worst fatigue and BPI pain interference. If six of 27 subjects (22%) met the primary endpoint, the trial would expand by another 36 subjects. RESULTS: Twenty-nine subjects were accrued. Nine of 29 (31%) subjects met the primary endpoint, with 21 (72%) evaluable for the primary endpoint. Among responders: median worst pain declined 62% (range 36-100) at Week 8 and 63% (range 38-100) at Week 12; median reduction of pain interference with general activity and sleep at Week 12 was 62% (range 18-100) and 53% (range 8-100) respectively; median reduction in worst fatigue of 45% (range 10-85) at Week 12. CONCLUSIONS: In the first prospective trial using standard Ra-223 doses, contemporary pain endpoints and PRO collection tools, Ra-223 palliated pain, reduced fatigue, and improved pain interference. The pain response rate easily exceeded the requirements for expansion to the second phase, but the trial was closed due to slow accrual.

Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial of Androgen Deprivation Therapy with or Without Docetaxel in High-risk Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer After Surgery (TAX3503).

BACKGROUND: No standard of care exists for patients with high-risk biochemical recurrence (BCR) after prostatectomy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether addition of docetaxel to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) improved progression-free survival (PFS) in high-risk BCR patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: TAX3503 was a multicenter phase 3 trial that randomized patients with high-risk BCR to ADT for 18 mo ± docetaxel (75 mg/m2 q3w for ten cycles). Eligibility included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥1.0 ng/ml after prostatectomy alone or after postoperative radiation therapy, PSA doubling time ≤9 mo, and absence of metastases on computed tomography and bone scintigraphy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary endpoint was PFS following testosterone recovery to noncastrate levels (testosterone >50 ng/dl). Secondary endpoints included time to testosterone recovery, overall survival (OS), quality of life, and safety. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Between September 2007 and May 2011, 413 patients were assigned to ADT ± docetaxel. In 2012, following completion of accrual and treatment, the sponsor withdrew support of the study, and in 2013, a registry was created to secure the primary endpoint. The final analysis included data from the original trial and registry. At a median follow-up of 33.6 mo, 260 patients demonstrated testosterone recovery, which occurred similarly between groups. ADT plus docetaxel trended toward a nonclinically meaningful improvement in PFS (median 26.2 vs 24.7 mo) for the testosterone-recovered population (218 events, hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61-1.04) and in OS for the intention-to-treat population (medians not reached, HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.23-1.10). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred more frequently in the ADT plus docetaxel group (48.0% vs 10.8%). CONCLUSIONS: TAX3503 did not demonstrate a meaningful benefit of adding docetaxel to ADT in patients with high-risk BCR. Testosterone recovery was unaffected by addition of docetaxel to ADT. PATIENT SUMMARY: Addition of docetaxel to androgen deprivation therapy did not meaningfully improve outcomes for men with high-risk biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.

Response to Standard Therapies and Comprehensive Genomic Analysis for Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma with EGFR Exon 20 Insertions.

PURPOSE: EGFR exon 20 insertions (ex20ins) are an uncommon genotype in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for which targeted therapies are under development. We sought to describe treatment outcomes and genomic and immunophenotypic characteristics of these tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We identified sequential patients with NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins and compared their clinical outcomes and pathologic features with other patients with NSCLC. RESULTS: Among 6,290 patients with NSCLC, 106 (2%) had EGFR ex20ins. Patients with EGFR ex20ins were more likely to be Black (14% vs. 6%; P < 0.001) or Asian (22% vs. 10%; P < 0.001) compared with all other patients with NSCLC. Median tumor mutational burden (TMB; 3.5 vs. 5.9; P < 0.001) and proportion of tumors with PD-L1 expression ≥1% (22% vs. 60%; P < 0.001) were lower in EGFR ex20ins compared with other NSCLCs (TMB, n = 5,851 and PD-L1 expression, n = 282) and EGFR del 19/L858R (median TMB, 3.5; P = 0.001 and 39% PD-L1 ≥ 1%; P = 0.02). Compared with a 2:1 cohort of patients with metastatic NSCLC without targetable alterations (n = 192), EGFR ex20ins patients had longer overall survival (median 20 vs. 12 months; HR, 0.56; P = 0.007) and longer time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) for platinum chemotherapy (median, 7 vs. 4 months; HR, 0.6; P = 0.02) and no improvement in TTD for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI; HR, 1.75; P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: With better outcomes on platinum chemotherapy, patients with EGFR ex20ins NSCLC have improved prognosis, lower PD-L1 expression and TMB, and derive less benefit from ICIs compared with patients with NSCLC without targetable oncogenes. Improving molecularly targeted therapies could provide greater benefit for patients with EGFR ex20ins.

Baseline Testosterone Levels in Men with Clinically Localized High-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy with or without Neoadjuvant Chemohormonal Therapy (Alliance).

PURPOSE: Men with low serum testosterone at the time of prostate cancer diagnosis are frequently considered to have more aggressive disease. We examined treatment outcomes in men with clinically localized high-risk cancer to determine if baseline testosterone level identified men at higher risk for cancer progression after treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Alliance/CALGB 90203 randomized men with clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer to radical prostatectomy alone or neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy and radical prostatectomy. Men with available baseline testosterone levels who had not received androgen deprivation prior to study enrollment were studied (656). Testosterone level was examined as a continuous variable, as quartiles, and separately in men with an absolute testosterone level above/below 150 ng/dl. Outcomes evaluated were overall survival and event-free survival with events defined by biochemical recurrence, secondary treatment, prostate cancer metastasis, and death. RESULTS: We were unable to demonstrate a difference between baseline serum testosterone level measured as a continuous variable, as quartiles, or as a dichotomous variable (above/below 150 ng/dl) with the outcomes measured. This finding was observed in both arms of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline serum testosterone level did not predict outcomes in men with clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy alone or neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy and radical prostatectomy.

Treatment Outcomes and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with KRAS-G12C-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSE: KRAS mutations are identified in approximately 30% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Novel direct inhibitors of KRAS G12C have shown activity in early-phase clinical trials. We hypothesized that patients with KRAS G12C mutations may have distinct clinical characteristics and responses to therapies. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Through routine next-generation sequencing, we identified patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC treated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (New York, NY) from 2014 to 2018 and reviewed tumor characteristics, overall survival, and treatment outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 1,194 patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC, including 770 with recurrent or metastatic disease. KRAS G12C mutations were present in 46% and KRAS non-G12C mutations in 54%. Patients with KRAS G12C had a higher tumor mutation burden (median, 8.8 vs. 7 mut/Mb; P = 0.006) and higher median PD-L1 expression (5% vs. 1%). The comutation patterns of STK11 (28% vs. 29%) and KEAP1 (23% vs. 24%) were similar. The median overall survivals from diagnosis were similar for KRAS G12C (13.4 months) and KRAS non-G12C mutations (13.1 months; P = 0.96). In patients with PD-L1 ≥50%, there was not a significant difference in response rate with single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor for patients with KRAS G12C mutations (40% vs. 58%; P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: We provide outcome data for a large series of patients with KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC with available therapies, demonstrating that responses and duration of benefit with available therapies are similar to those seen in patients with KRAS non-G12C mutations. Strategies to incorporate new targeted therapies into the current treatment paradigm will need to consider outcomes specific to patients harboring KRAS G12C mutations.